Loading...
Loading...
The UGC NET cutoff is the minimum score a candidate must achieve to be declared qualified for Junior Research Fellowship (JRF), appointment as Assistant Professor, or admission to PhD programmes. Published by the National Testing Agency (NTA) after each session, the cutoff varies by subject, category, and the purpose of qualification. This page explains the structure of the cutoff, presents data from recent sessions, and explains how to interpret the qualifying marks.
For the complete exam guide including eligibility and pattern, visit the UGC NET main page.
| Topic Link | |
| UGC NET Overview | UGC NET Exam Guide |
| Eligibility Criteria | UGC NET Eligibility Criteria |
| Syllabus | UGC NET Syllabus |
| Exam Pattern | UGC NET Exam Info |
| Test Series | UGC NET Test Series |
| Result | UGC NET Result |
| Previous Year Papers | UGC NET PYQ |
The UGC NET cutoff is not a single universal score. It operates at two distinct levels:
The first level is a basic qualifying threshold based on the combined marks of Paper 1 and Paper 2. Any candidate who scores at or above this threshold is considered to have qualified for the purpose of eligibility:
| Category Minimum Qualifying Percentage Equivalent Marks (out of 300) | ||
| General / EWS | 40% | 120 |
| OBC-NCL / SC / ST / PwD / Third Gender | 35% | 105 |
Clearing this threshold qualifies a candidate for the post of Assistant Professor. Meeting the qualifying threshold alone does not, however, guarantee JRF.
The second level is the JRF merit cutoff, which is significantly higher than the qualifying threshold. JRF is awarded to a limited number of top-ranking candidates from among those who are eligible (that is, within the age limit of 30 years and qualified at Level 1). The number of JRF seats is determined by the UGC in each session.
The JRF cutoff is published subject-wise and category-wise and represents the score of the last candidate who was awarded the fellowship in a given subject and category combination.
The December 2024 session was held in a single shift, which meant no normalization was applied. Cutoffs for that session were published as raw marks out of 300.
A total of 5,158 candidates qualified for JRF, 53,279 qualified for Assistant Professor, and 1,14,445 qualified for PhD admission in that session. Around 6.49 lakh candidates appeared from 8.49 lakh registrations, recording an attendance of 76.5 percent.
| Subject Unreserved EWS OBC-NCL SC ST | |||||
| Economics | 206 | 194 | 192 | 178 | 172 |
| Political Science | 234 | 226 | 226 | 212 | 208 |
| Philosophy | 210 | 194 | 196 | 190 | 172 |
| Psychology | 238 | 228 | 226 | 214 | 206 |
| Sociology | 228 | 220 | 216 | 206 | 204 |
| Hindi | 218 | 210 | 210 | 200 | 192 |
| History | 206 | 198 | 198 | 188 | 182 |
Source: National Testing Agency, December 2024 official cutoff PDF
These figures represent raw scores out of 300. JRF cutoffs were higher across most major subjects in December 2024 compared to the previous session, with the exception of Economics.
| Subject Unreserved EWS OBC-NCL SC ST | |||||
| Economics | 180 | 166 | 162 | 150 | 148 |
| Political Science | 198 | 188 | 186 | 172 | 168 |
| Psychology | 202 | 192 | 190 | 178 | 172 |
| Sociology | 192 | 182 | 178 | 168 | 162 |
| Hindi | 186 | 176 | 174 | 162 | 156 |
| History | 174 | 164 | 162 | 150 | 146 |
Note: These figures are indicative based on officially released data. Candidates should verify from the official NTA cutoff PDF for their specific subject and category combination.
The cutoff for each session is not predetermined. It is calculated after the exam based on several variables:
Subjects with a larger number of appearing candidates tend to have higher cutoffs because competition is more intense and the pool of high-scorers is larger. Popular subjects like Political Science, Sociology, and Hindi consistently draw hundreds of thousands of candidates.
A more difficult paper results in lower overall scores, which brings the cutoff down. Conversely, if a session's papers are considered easier by candidates, higher scores are expected and the cutoff rises accordingly.
The UGC allocates a specific number of JRF seats per session. The JRF cutoff is the score of the last candidate selected within the allocated seats for each subject-category combination. When JRF seats are limited, even high scores may not be sufficient.
When the exam is conducted across multiple shifts, NTA applies percentile-based normalization to equate scores across different sets. In such sessions, the cutoff is expressed as a percentile rather than a raw score. This means the actual number of marks required to achieve a particular percentile can vary between candidates appearing in different shifts.
Each subject has separate cutoffs for General, EWS, OBC-NCL, SC, ST, PwD, and Third Gender categories. Reserved categories have lower cutoffs, both for qualifying and for JRF.
Based on data from sessions across multiple years, the following trends are consistently observed:
JRF cutoffs are always higher than Assistant Professor cutoffs in every subject and category. The gap between JRF and AP cutoffs in a subject like Political Science can be 30 to 40 marks out of 300.
High-enrollment subjects have higher cutoffs. Subjects like Political Science, Psychology, and Sociology, which have large numbers of candidates, tend to have higher cutoffs than niche subjects with fewer aspirants.
Cutoffs fluctuate year to year. A difficult December session may see cutoffs 10 to 20 marks lower than a straightforward June session for the same subject. Candidates should not assume the cutoff will remain identical across sessions.
Reserved category cutoffs are uniformly lower. Across all subjects and both JRF and AP categories, SC/ST and PwD cutoffs are consistently lower than General and OBC-NCL cutoffs, reflecting the reservation policy and differential qualifying thresholds.
Single-shift sessions have raw-score cutoffs. Multi-shift sessions have percentile-based cutoffs. Candidates should understand which format applies to their session to correctly interpret their scorecard.
After the exam, candidates can estimate their qualification status before the official result using the following approach:
Step 1: Count the number of correct answers in Paper 1 and Paper 2 using the official provisional answer key released by NTA.
Step 2: Multiply the number of correct answers by 2 to get the raw score (no deductions for wrong answers).
Step 3: Compare the raw score with the previous session's qualifying cutoff for your subject and category.
Step 4: If the exam was held in a single shift, the raw score directly indicates qualification likelihood. If held in multiple shifts, wait for the official percentile-based cutoff.
Example:
| Candidate Category Correct in Paper 1 Correct in Paper 2 Total Raw Score Qualifying Threshold Status | |||||
| General | 38 | 65 | (38+65) x 2 = 206 | 120 (40%) | Qualified for AP; compare with JRF cutoff |
| OBC-NCL | 30 | 52 | (30+52) x 2 = 164 | 105 (35%) | Qualified for AP |
Since the UGC authorized universities to use NET scores for PhD admission, a third tier of cutoff has emerged. The PhD admission cutoff is lower than the JRF cutoff and is set by individual universities and institutions. It is not a uniform national cutoff; each university decides its own minimum NET score for PhD admission.
Candidates who do not qualify for JRF but meet the qualifying threshold may still use their NET score for PhD admission in universities that accept it. The specific score required varies by institution and is announced through individual university admission notifications.
Many candidates confuse the qualifying threshold with the JRF cutoff. The table below clarifies the distinction:
| Parameter Qualifying (AP) Cutoff JRF Cutoff | ||
| Who sets it | NTA, based on fixed percentage (40%/35%) | NTA, based on number of JRF seats and ranking |
| Nature | Fixed percentage threshold | Variable, based on exam performance and competition |
| Eligibility outcome | Assistant Professor + PhD admission | JRF fellowship + AP + PhD |
| Age requirement | None | Maximum 30 years (with relaxations) |
| Subject-specific | Yes (different percentages per category) | Yes (different cutoffs per subject and category) |
Clearing the qualifying threshold for Assistant Professor (120 marks for General, 105 for reserved) is achievable with focused preparation. Scoring high enough for JRF requires a more intensive strategy. The following approach helps build a competitive score:
Target 75+ in Paper 1. Paper 1 covers a fixed, limited syllabus. With consistent practice, scoring 75 to 90 out of 100 is achievable and gives a strong base before Paper 2 even begins.
Identify high-weightage units in Paper 2. Analyse previous year papers through the UGC NET PYQ page to find which units appear most frequently. Prioritize these units for deeper study.
Attempt all 150 questions. With no negative marking, every unanswered question is a guaranteed zero. Even uncertain questions should be attempted.
Use the test series to benchmark performance. Regular mock tests reveal where scores are falling short. The UGC NET Test Series on Aspirant Mitraa includes 400 tests covering topic-wise, subject-wise, and full-length mock tests to help candidates identify the gap between their current performance and the target cutoff.
Analyse previous year papers. Attempt past papers from the UGC NET PYQ section to understand what a 200+ score in a competitive subject requires in terms of accuracy and topic coverage.
Based on publicly available NTA data across multiple sessions, the approximate JRF cutoff range for the Unreserved category in several popular subjects has typically fallen within:
| Subject Approximate JRF Cutoff Range (Unreserved, Raw Score out of 300) | |
| Political Science | 220 to 240 |
| Psychology | 230 to 250 |
| Sociology | 215 to 235 |
| Economics | 190 to 220 |
| History | 195 to 215 |
| Hindi | 205 to 225 |
| English | 210 to 230 |
| Education | 195 to 220 |
| Commerce | 195 to 215 |
| Management | 185 to 210 |
These are historical ranges and not predictions. Actual cutoffs depend on the difficulty of each session and the number of candidates. Always refer to the official NTA cutoff PDF for each session for accurate data.
After the result is declared, NTA publishes the subject-wise and category-wise cutoff PDF on the official portal:
The cutoff PDF is organized by subject code. Cross-reference the subject code list from the official notification to identify your subject's row correctly.
Does qualifying the UGC NET guarantee a JRF award? No. Qualifying the minimum threshold (40% for General) grants eligibility for Assistant Professor. JRF is awarded only to candidates who rank within the JRF merit list based on the allocated JRF seats for their subject and category.
If I qualify in one session, do I need to reappear in the next session to maintain eligibility? No. Once a candidate qualifies for Assistant Professor, the eligibility is permanent. JRF certification, however, is valid for three years from the date of issue.
Is the cutoff the same for both the June and December sessions in the same year? No. Each session has its own cutoff, which is calculated based on that session's exam performance and the number of qualified candidates.
What is the difference between a percentile cutoff and a raw score cutoff? A raw score cutoff is the actual number of marks out of 300 that a candidate must score. A percentile cutoff indicates the percentage of candidates below that score. In multi-shift exams, NTA uses percentile to normalize performance across different question sets.
Can a candidate who scored above the AP cutoff but below the JRF cutoff still use their score for PhD admission? Yes. Candidates who meet the qualifying threshold for AP are also eligible to use their NET score for PhD admission in institutions that accept it. The actual requirement varies by university.
For related resources, visit: