Loading...
Loading...
The CA Intermediate cutoff refers to the minimum marks required to pass each group of the examination. Unlike many competitive exams where cutoffs shift based on candidate performance, the CA Intermediate has a fixed passing criterion prescribed by ICAI that remains consistent across all sessions. However, the actual pass percentage varies significantly between sessions and between groups, reflecting the difficulty of the papers and the preparation level of candidates appearing in each cycle.
This page covers the complete passing criteria, session-wise pass percentage data for both groups, paper-wise failure patterns, and strategies to consistently clear both groups.
For the complete CA Intermediate exam overview, visit the CA Intermediate main page.
| Topic Link | |
| CA Intermediate Overview | CA Intermediate Exam Guide |
| Exam Pattern | CA Intermediate Exam Info |
| Syllabus | CA Intermediate Syllabus |
| Result | CA Intermediate Result |
| Exam Analysis | CA Intermediate Exam Analysis |
| Previous Year Papers | CA Intermediate PYQ |
| Syllabus Tracker | CA Intermediate Syllabus Tracker |
The CA Intermediate passing criteria operates at the group level. Each group has its own passing threshold and must be cleared independently.
| Condition Requirement | |
| Minimum marks in each individual paper | 40 out of 100 (40%) in every paper within the group |
| Minimum aggregate per group | 150 out of 300 (50%) in that group |
Both conditions must be satisfied simultaneously within the same group attempt. Failing either condition results in a fail for that group, even if the other condition is met.
| Group Papers Min per Paper Min Aggregate | |||
| Group I | Papers 1, 2, 3 | 40 each | 150 out of 300 |
| Group II | Papers 4, 5, 6 | 40 each | 150 out of 300 |
| Performance Aggregate Score in Group | |
| Pass | 150 to 179 out of 300 (with min 40 per paper) |
| Pass with Distinction | 180 or above out of 300 (60% or above) |
| Paper 1 Paper 2 Paper 3 Group I Total Status | ||||
| 55 | 52 | 50 | 157 | Passed |
| 60 | 55 | 35 | 150 | Failed (Paper 3 below 40) |
| 50 | 48 | 45 | 143 | Failed (aggregate below 150) |
| 40 | 40 | 70 | 150 | Passed (exactly at threshold) |
| 65 | 62 | 58 | 185 | Passed with Distinction |
CA Intermediate has a group exemption facility that does not exist in CA Foundation. If a candidate passes Group I but fails Group II in the same attempt, Group I is retained and the candidate only needs to reappear in Group II in future attempts. The reverse also applies.
This exemption remains valid for the duration of the registration validity (five years). If a candidate has Group I exempt and fails Group II multiple times, they continue to only appear in Group II until they either pass it or their registration expires.
ICAI publishes the group-wise pass percentage alongside each result declaration. The following data is based on officially released ICAI figures.
| Session Group I Pass Percentage | |
| January 2026 | Approximately 20 to 25% |
| September 2025 | Approximately 14 to 18% |
| May 2025 | Approximately 22 to 26% |
| January 2025 | Approximately 20 to 24% |
| September 2024 | Approximately 12 to 16% |
| May 2024 | Approximately 18 to 22% |
| January 2023 | Approximately 28 to 32% (old scheme) |
| May 2022 | Approximately 24 to 28% (old scheme) |
| Session Group II Pass Percentage | |
| January 2026 | Approximately 22 to 28% |
| September 2025 | Approximately 16 to 22% |
| May 2025 | Approximately 24 to 28% |
| January 2025 | Approximately 22 to 26% |
| September 2024 | Approximately 15 to 20% |
| May 2024 | Approximately 20 to 24% |
CA Intermediate pass percentages have historically been lower than CA Foundation pass percentages in corresponding sessions, reflecting the greater depth and complexity of the six-paper Intermediate syllabus.
The difficulty of individual papers, particularly Paper 1 (Advanced Accounting) and Paper 3 (Taxation), has the most significant impact on Group I pass rates. Sessions where Taxation includes a complex Income Tax computation or where Accounting Standards questions are harder tend to see lower Group I pass rates.
For Group II, Paper 5 (Auditing and Ethics) difficulty variation, particularly in the SAs-based questions, is the primary driver of Group II pass rate fluctuations.
May and January sessions attract the highest volume of candidates. May sessions include many first-time candidates, which historically contributes to lower pass rates. September sessions tend to have fewer candidates and a slightly higher proportion of experienced repeat candidates, which contributes to marginally higher pass rates in some years.
Paper 3 (Taxation) is uniquely affected by annual amendments to Income Tax and GST laws. Sessions where significant amendments apply for the first time (new tax regime provisions, GST rate changes, new sections) tend to produce lower scores because candidates are less familiar with the updated provisions.
Since the 70:30 pattern was introduced under the new scheme, the 30-mark MCQ section has influenced results in both directions. Candidates who practise case-study MCQs specifically tend to score well in this section, while those who prepare only for the subjective component often underperform in the MCQ portion.
Based on patterns observed across multiple sessions, the following failure rate hierarchy has emerged:
| Paper Failure Rate Pattern | |
| Paper 1: Advanced Accounting | Highest failure rate in Group I; Consolidation and Amalgamation questions commonly cause failures |
| Paper 2: Corporate and Other Laws | Moderate failure rate; scenario-based law questions challenge candidates without reading depth |
| Paper 3: Taxation | High failure rate; GST computation and amendment-based Income Tax questions are primary failure drivers |
| Paper Failure Rate Pattern | |
| Paper 4: Cost and Management Accounting | Moderate to high failure rate; Standard Costing variance analysis and Budget preparation are common weak areas |
| Paper 5: Auditing and Ethics | Moderate failure rate; SAs-based scenario questions and Ethics provisions catch unprepared candidates |
| Paper 6: Financial Management and Strategic Management | Lower failure rate than Papers 4 and 5; Capital Budgeting and Working Capital are manageable with regular practice |
Setting target scores above the minimum passing threshold reduces the risk of failing due to one unexpectedly difficult paper.
| Paper Minimum to Pass Conservative Target Competitive Target | |||
| Paper 1: Advanced Accounting | 40 | 50 to 60 | 60 to 70 |
| Paper 2: Corporate and Other Laws | 40 | 50 to 60 | 60 to 70 |
| Paper 3: Taxation | 40 | 50 to 58 | 58 to 68 |
| Group I Total | 150 | 150 to 178 | 178 to 208 |
| Paper Minimum to Pass Conservative Target Competitive Target | |||
| Paper 4: Cost and Management Accounting | 40 | 50 to 58 | 58 to 68 |
| Paper 5: Auditing and Ethics | 40 | 50 to 58 | 58 to 68 |
| Paper 6: Financial Management | 40 | 50 to 60 | 60 to 72 |
| Group II Total | 150 | 150 to 176 | 176 to 208 |
Unlike CA Foundation Papers 3 and 4, the 30-mark MCQ section in all CA Intermediate papers carries no negative marking. This means:
In the 70-mark subjective section, partial marks are awarded for correct approaches even when the final answer is wrong. Showing all workings in numerical questions is therefore essential.
Candidates who are dissatisfied with their marks can apply for verification and certified copies of answer scripts after the result.
| Service Papers Fee Deadline | |||
| Marks Verification | All six papers | Rs. 100 per paper | 30 days from result declaration |
| Certified Copy of Answer Script | All six papers (subjective portion) | Rs. 500 per paper | 30 days from result declaration |
Reviewing the certified copy of answer scripts is one of the most useful preparation activities for candidates who did not pass. It reveals exactly where marks were lost and guides targeted improvement for the next attempt.
Papers 1, 3, and 4 have the highest individual failure rates across both groups. Clearing these papers comfortably (above 50) provides the aggregate buffer needed to pass the group even if one other paper is slightly weaker.
The 30-mark MCQ section in all six papers is case-study based. Candidates who treat MCQs as an afterthought and prepare only for subjective answers consistently underperform in this section. Practise MCQ sets from ICAI MTPs and RTPs specifically for the MCQ format from the beginning of preparation.
Paper 3 (Taxation) requires preparation with the specific assessment year and GST notifications applicable to the exam session. Always check the ICAI official announcement for the applicable amendments before starting Taxation preparation.
The CA Intermediate Syllabus Tracker helps candidates maintain visibility of which chapters across all six papers have been covered, which are in progress, and which are pending. Given the volume of the Intermediate syllabus, this systematic tracking is essential.
Solving complete previous year papers from the CA Intermediate PYQ page builds the exam temperament needed to manage three hours with both subjective problems and case-study MCQs.
Is the CA Intermediate cutoff the same for all six papers? The minimum qualifying marks are fixed at 40 per paper and 150 aggregate per group for all candidates regardless of the session. What changes is the pass percentage, which depends on paper difficulty and candidate performance.
Does scoring 150 in Group I guarantee passing, even if two papers are below 40? No. Both conditions must be met simultaneously. If any paper is below 40 marks, the group is failed regardless of the aggregate.
Can a candidate who failed a group due to one paper below 40 claim any partial credit? No formal partial credit or credit transfer exists. The entire group must be re-attempted. However, if the other group was passed in the same attempt, that group remains exempt.
Is there a difference between old scheme and new scheme pass percentages? The passing criteria (40 per paper, 50 percent aggregate per group) is the same in both schemes. However, the new scheme's 70:30 pattern and the case-study MCQ format have introduced a new dimension of preparation, which has influenced pass rates in early new-scheme sessions as candidates adapt.
What percentage is needed for CA Intermediate Distinction? Candidates who score 180 marks or above out of 300 in a group (60 percent or above aggregate) are declared to have passed with Distinction for that group.
For related pages, visit: