Loading...
Loading...
Previous year question papers are the single most reliable resource for understanding what the CA Intermediate examination expects. They reveal how ICAI frames questions from the prescribed syllabus across both the 70-mark subjective section and the 30-mark scenario-based MCQ section, which chapters are consistently prioritised, how complex the numerical problems are, and what level of legal or auditing knowledge is actually tested versus what merely appears in the study material.
This page explains the types of past papers available for CA Intermediate, how to access them, which sessions to prioritise, and how to build a PYQ practice strategy across all six papers.
For the complete CA Intermediate overview, visit the CA Intermediate main page.
| Topic Link | |
| CA Intermediate Overview | CA Intermediate Exam Guide |
| Syllabus | CA Intermediate Syllabus |
| Exam Pattern | CA Intermediate Exam Info |
| Exam Analysis | CA Intermediate Exam Analysis |
| Cutoff | CA Intermediate Cutoff |
| Syllabus Tracker | CA Intermediate Syllabus Tracker |
| Type Full Name Purpose Released By Frequency | ||||
| PYQs | Previous Year Question Papers | Actual exam papers from past sessions with suggested answers | ICAI | After every session |
| MTPs | Mock Test Papers | Session-specific practice papers (2 series per session) | ICAI Board of Studies | Before every session |
| RTPs | Revision Test Papers | Chapter-wise revision with suggested answers | ICAI Board of Studies | Before every session |
All three are available for free download from the ICAI official website at icai.org. Each serves a distinct purpose in the preparation cycle and all three should be used together for maximum benefit.
ICAI publishes the complete question papers and suggested answers for every session after the result is declared.
| Session Papers Available | |
| May 2026 | Paper 1 to 6 with suggested answers (to be released after result) |
| January 2026 | Paper 1 to 6 with suggested answers |
| September 2025 | Paper 1 to 6 with suggested answers |
| May 2025 | Paper 1 to 6 with suggested answers |
| January 2025 | Paper 1 to 6 with suggested answers |
| September 2024 | Paper 1 to 6 with suggested answers |
| May 2024 | Paper 1 to 6 with suggested answers (first new-scheme session) |
| January 2024 | Old scheme papers (8 papers; useful for conceptual practice) |
| December 2023 | Old scheme papers |
| Earlier sessions | Old scheme papers; use for concept practice, not format practice |
Important note on scheme transition: The new scheme (6 papers, 70:30 pattern) was implemented fully from May 2024. Papers from before May 2024 used the old scheme (8 papers, fully subjective). For format-aligned practice, use May 2024 onwards. For conceptual depth, older papers remain useful for subject areas where the core syllabus overlaps.
Method 1: ICAI Official Website
Method 2: ICAI BoS Knowledge Portal
Method 3: ICAI Examination Portal Some sessions' question papers are also accessible at icaiexam.icai.org after the exam concludes and before the result is declared as part of the answer key challenge process.
MTPs are practice papers released by the ICAI Board of Studies specifically for each upcoming session. For every CA Intermediate session, ICAI releases two series of MTPs (Series I and Series II) for both groups.
| Session MTP Series I MTP Series II | ||
| May Session | February to March | March to April |
| September Session | June to July | July to August |
| January Session | October to November | November |
MTPs are structured exactly like the actual exam paper: 70-mark subjective section followed by 30-mark scenario-based MCQs. The suggested answers include model answers for subjective questions and explanations for each MCQ option.
MTPs are particularly important under the 70:30 format because they are the only practice resource that replicates the exact paper structure with both subjective and MCQ sections in the same document. Previous year papers from May 2024 onwards also have this format, but MTPs are released specifically calibrated for the current session's amendment and syllabus scope.
For Taxation specifically, MTPs are released after the taxation amendments circular is published and are therefore aligned with the current session's applicable provisions. This makes them more reliable for tax computation practice than general PYQs from earlier sessions.
RTPs are released by ICAI for each session and focus on chapter-wise revision practice with suggested answers. Unlike full papers (PYQs and MTPs), RTPs test specific units of the syllabus rather than all chapters simultaneously.
| When to Use RTPs Benefit | |
| After completing a chapter | Immediate testing of understanding |
| During revision of a weak area | Focused practice without the pressure of a full paper |
| Before attempting MTPs | Warm-up at chapter level before full paper practice |
RTPs also include the MCQ format in chapter-specific sets, making them useful for practising scenario-based MCQs for specific chapters before tackling complete paper MCQ sections.
Papers from May 2024 onwards are the most relevant because they are set under the new scheme with the 70:30 format. These papers:
For Papers 1, 4, and 5, older papers from the eight-paper scheme cover the same core chapters:
Use older papers for additional numerical practice in accounting and costing, and for SAs-based questions in auditing. However, do not use them to understand the MCQ section format or taxation, as both have changed significantly.
Sessions to solve: All available new-scheme sessions (May 2024 onwards) Additional: Old scheme accounting papers for additional practice on Consolidation and Amalgamation
Focus in PYQ practice:
Using suggested answers: After solving Paper 1 questions, compare your financial statement format (column alignment, schedule presentation, working notes) with ICAI's suggested answer. Marks in Paper 1 are awarded partly for correct format and presentation, not just correct figures.
Sessions to solve: All new-scheme sessions; also useful are old-scheme law papers for Companies Act depth
Focus in PYQ practice:
MCQ section in PYQs: PYQ MCQs in Paper 2 reveal that ICAI's scenario-based approach tests identification of the relevant section, not just knowledge of the section's content. Practice identifying which Companies Act chapter a given scenario belongs to before reading the options.
Sessions to solve: Only new-scheme sessions (May 2024 onwards); older papers are less relevant due to annual amendments
Critical discipline for Paper 3 PYQs:
GST PYQs: GST questions evolve as circulars and rates change. Solve GST questions from recent sessions (January 2026 and May 2025) as these most accurately reflect the level of GST knowledge tested under current provisions.
MTP Priority for Taxation: For Taxation, MTPs are actually more valuable than older PYQs because they are prepared after the taxation amendments circular is released and are therefore perfectly aligned with current provisions.
Sessions to solve: All new-scheme sessions; old scheme cost accounting papers for additional numerical practice
Focus in PYQ practice:
Common pattern: Cost Accounting PYQs consistently show that candidates who write properly labeled working notes receive partial marks even when the final answer is incorrect. ICAI's suggested answers always show comprehensive working notes.
Sessions to solve: All new-scheme sessions; also old scheme auditing papers for SAs depth
Focus in PYQ practice:
SA-based MCQs: PYQs reveal that MCQs in Paper 5 test specific aspects of SAs through scenarios. Practise identifying which SA applies to a given audit scenario before attempting to select the correct MCQ option.
Sessions to solve: All new-scheme sessions
Focus in PYQ practice:
Strategic Management in MCQs: PYQ analysis reveals that Strategic Management MCQs often present a business situation and ask which strategic choice it exemplifies (cost leadership vs differentiation vs focus). Understanding the frameworks conceptually is more valuable than memorizing definitions.
| Preparation Phase PYQ Activity | |
| After completing each chapter | Solve RTPs for that chapter |
| After completing half the syllabus | Solve one complete MTP Series I paper for each paper |
| After completing the full syllabus | Solve at least 3 full PYQ papers per paper in timed conditions |
| Final 3 to 4 weeks before exam | Alternate between PYQs and MTP Series II papers |
Track chapter completion alongside this schedule using the CA Intermediate Syllabus Tracker to ensure PYQ practice happens only after adequate preparation for the relevant chapters.
For subjective sections (70 marks):
For MCQ sections (30 marks):
Are CA Intermediate PYQs available for free? Yes. ICAI provides all previous year question papers, suggested answers, MTPs, and RTPs for free through icai.org and the BoS Knowledge Portal. No payment is required to access these resources.
How many years of PYQs should I solve for CA Intermediate? Given that the new scheme began in May 2024, candidates have a growing library of new-scheme papers. Solving all available new-scheme sessions (currently May 2024 through January 2026) is the minimum. For additional numerical practice, older papers are also useful for Papers 1, 4, and 6.
Are MTPs harder or easier than the actual CA Intermediate exam? MTPs are calibrated to approximate the actual exam difficulty. In some sessions, the actual exam has been slightly harder than the MTP (particularly for Paper 3 in Taxation-heavy sessions). Treat MTPs as the baseline and prepare for the possibility that the actual exam could be harder.
Should I solve PYQs in timed conditions? Yes. Timed practice is essential. Three hours per paper is the actual constraint. Solving PYQs without a timer does not build the exam temperament needed to manage both the 70-mark subjective section and the 30-mark MCQ section within the three-hour window.
Is solving ICAI study material questions sufficient without PYQs? ICAI study material covers concepts comprehensively, but it does not replicate the exam's question style or difficulty calibration. PYQs reveal how ICAI selects specific topics within a chapter for examination and what complexity level is expected. Combining both is the most effective approach.
For related pages, visit: